Why President Trump Is Imposing Tariffs in 2025 and the Risks of U.S. Debt

Overview

In 2025, President Donald Trump is aggressively imposing new tariffs on imports from China and the European Union (EU). These actions are aimed at addressing the United States’ longstanding trade imbalance, revitalising domestic manufacturing, and confronting the national debt crisis. While unorthodox, the strategy is designed to force protectionist economies to negotiate and to reduce America’s overdependence on foreign production and borrowing.

The U.S. Trade Imbalance: A Core Problem

  • The U.S. imports significantly more than it exports, creating a trade deficit of over $1 trillion annually.
  • Key sources of this imbalance are China and the EU, which maintain protectionist policies.
  • This imbalance contributes directly to dollar outflows, undermining U.S. industry and adding to the national debt.

National Debt and Economic Fragility

  • As of May 2025, the U.S. national debt exceeds $36 trillion.
  • Annual interest payments are now over $680 billion, absorbing nearly 1/6 of federal spending.
  • Much of this debt is held by foreign powers, including China, giving them leverage over U.S. policy.

Trump’s Tariff Strategy Explained

  • 50% tariffs on EU imports are set to take effect June 1, 2025.
  • Threats of 25% tariffs on foreign-made smartphones, including Apple, unless production returns to U.S. soil.
  • These moves aim to:
    • Reduce the trade deficit.
    • Pressure countries into fairer trade terms.
    • Rebuild U.S. manufacturing strength.

Effectiveness of Tariff Leverage

  • Trump has successfully used tariffs in the past:
    • Mexico (2019): Agreed to immigration enforcement within 10 days of tariff threats.
    • China (2020): Signed the “Phase One” trade deal following major tariffs.
    • South Korea, Canada, and the EU: All re-entered trade talks following tariff pressure.

 

Impacts of 50% EU Tariffs

In simple terms, a 50% tariff on EU goods will hit European exporters hard. In the short term, it will cause sudden price spikes and reduced demand for EU cars, machinery, wine, and luxury goods in the U.S.—their single largest export market outside the bloc. In the medium term, EU manufacturers will face falling revenues, layoffs, and pressure from major exporters like Germany and France to resolve the dispute. Over the long term, if unresolved, EU firms may lose permanent market share to U.S. or Asian competitors. With the U.S. buying over $500 billion in EU exports annually, the losses from these tariffs could run into the hundreds of billions, leaving the EU with little choice but to come back to the negotiating table.

The Global Currency Challenge

  • The U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency, underpinning global trade and America’s borrowing power.
  • China is actively working to replace the dollar by:
    • Using yuan in energy deals.
    • Promoting digital currency and alternative payment systems.
    • Encouraging BRICS nations to adopt a new trade currency.

If the Dollar Loses Dominance:

  • The U.S. would face higher borrowing costsimport inflation, and a weakened geopolitical position.
  • The entire U.S. economic model could be destabilised.

What the U.S. Must Do

  1. Enforce fair trade through targeted tariffs.
  2. Invest in domestic industry (tech, energy, manufacturing).
  3. Reduce dependency on rival economies.
  4. Control national debt through responsible fiscal policy.
  5. Negotiate new trade alliances to diversify markets.

Conclusion Trump’s tariff approach is controversial but grounded in the urgent need to confront systemic economic risks. The combination of an unsustainable trade imbalance, ballooning debt, and the threat to the dollar’s status demands bold action. Without serious reform, the U.S. risks losing its economic independence and global leadership.

Prepared: May 2025

 

Art Laffer – Former Reagan Economic Advisor

Art Laffer views Trump’s use of tariffs as a strategic tool to negotiate better trade deals. He stated:

“What he’s done now is he’s gotten them in a position where they’re going to lose their access to the U.S. market if they don’t redress these types of inequities that they’ve done… I believe he can negotiate freer trade deals… and it’ll be a win, win.” Fox Business

Laffer believes that this approach could lead to global economic prosperity through improved trade agreements.

 

leave a comment